The Cross: Symbol of God’s Love or Oppressive Christian Regime?


The city of Steubenville isn’t very big and not much ever really happens there, but it has its history. Part of that history is Franciscan University of Steubenville. The University is the city’s largest employer and brings thousands of young adults from all over the nation to the city every year – and I was one of those young adults. It is one of Steubenville’s most memorable aspects and no part of the university is more memorable than its iconic chapel, seated at the center of campus. It would only seem natural then, that, in crafting a city logo featuring all of Steubenville’s most celebrated features, Franciscan’s Christ the King Chapel be included.

However, this apparently represented an affront worthy of legal action to a Madison, Wisconsin-based atheist group, the Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc., which threatened to file a lawsuit against the city of Steubenville unless Franciscan’s chapel was removed from the logo. Faced with an expensive lawsuit, the city initially agreed to remove the chapel. Here’s the logo that brought on such ire:

Clearly, that cross in the corner signifies the impending enslavement of the people to Christianity.

Franciscan University reacted to the city’s decision with the following statement (read the full statement here):

“For more than 65 years, Franciscan University of Steubenville has proudly served as an integral part of this community and we were honored to have our chapel included in the new city of Steubenville logo. The city initially included our chapel because it represents Franciscan University, a world-renowned center of higher learning and one of the largest employers in the region. We find it particularly troubling that an out of town and out of touch group targeted the University for removal from the logo solely because of our religious identity.”

FFRF Co-President Annie Laurie Gaylor, however, had already given her ultimatum that, “crosses do not belong on the logos of American cities. We are not a ‘Christian nation’ or a theocracy, but were first among nations to adopt a secular constitution wisely separating religion from government.”

Franciscan’s second most iconic location. Can’t you just feel its presence oppressing you?

However, now James Bordas Jr., an attorney, has offered to represent the city pro-bono in which case Steubenville might fight to keep its logo after all.

The Freedom from Religion Foundation is now warning Steubenville to “not be duped” by such offers of charity. Because, clearly, Christians trying to help the city fight a lawsuit is the real threat to the city and taxpayers and not, say, the threat of a lawsuit itself.

Nothing says “you’re being oppressed by religion” more than a symbol stating, “God loves you so much he died for you.”

It seems to me, instead, that any organization going by the name, “freedom from religion” should actually be in favor of Steubenville’s logo. Franciscan University did not coerce the city to put a cross in their logo and it in no way is meant to “force religion” on people. Instead, the cross and its chapel represent a key facet in the city’s identity. That should be celebrated because it shows that religious and government bodies can co-exist in peace, not as isolated polar bodies but as brothers co-exist. It shows that we are no Soviet Union or Communist China, that we do not kill or operate forced-labor camps to oppress those of differing views. Instead, it shows that we are free.

So, should Madison, Wisconsin really decide how Steubenville, Ohio presents itself? This isn’t about oppressing non-Christians. This is about heritage, specifically: Steubenville’s heritage – and that’s something over which a group hundreds of miles away in Wisconsin should have no say.

Advertisements

I’m a Franciscan Graduate and I Stand with my Alma Mater Against Obamacare


My undergraduate career has ended and I now have my Bachelor’s of Science in Nursing. I’ll have some more time to commit to this blog now, at least until late June at which point I’ll be flying up to Alaska for summer work.

In addition to graduating this past week, my now Alma mater announced that they will be dropping their health coverage for students because, due to Obamacare, such coverage will now be mandated to cover birth control in violation of Catholic conscience and will also cause the costs of student health insurance to triple.

Mike Hernon, the school’s vice president of advancement, stated, “This is putting people in a position where they are having to choose between their faith and their morality, and now an unjust cost, these sorts of regulations from the government are forcing our hand in a way that’s really wrong.”

Hernon also told Fox News on Wednesday that the changes represented a “moral and economic injustice.”

While the left condemns the move as extreme, citing ad nauseum that 98% of Catholic women use contraception I stand with Franciscan University as does the overwhelming majority of its student body, men and women both. Because, as Mike Hernon put it, just because everyone might say that something is okay doesn’t make it morally acceptable.

Fr. Dan Pattee on the HHS Mandate


A little over a week ago I attended a talk by Fr. Dan Pattee, TOR, on the HHS mandate forcing all insurance policies to provide contraception, abortifacients and sterilization free of charge. Fr. Pattee is the chair of the Department of Theology at Franciscan University; the talk in its entirety is available on youtube: